Monday, March 25, 2013
Western Cape housing budget released
Cape Town - The Western Cape human settlements department has delivered over 94 000 sites and houses in the last three years, provincial MEC Bonginkosi Madikizela said on Monday.
“From April 2009 to March 31, 2013... a total of 94,228 sites and houses, will have been delivered, at a cost of R5.12 billion,” he said at the provincial budget vote in Cape Town.
Around R2.1 billion had been budgeted for the new financial year, starting in April. This was made up of a grant allocation of R1.94bn and an operational budget of around R150 million.
Madikizela said the focus of the budget was on the poorest of citizens.
“The provision of housing solutions gives them a hand up so they can become part of the “whole-of-society”, becoming contributors to both their own success, and that of greater society,” he said.
One of the ways to help the poor was to formalise backyard shacks by upgrading existing informal settlements. Another was to provide affordable housing through market mechanisms and densifying suburbs.
Madikizela said an area which had long been overlooked was the issue of farmworker housing.
Many farmworkers had not registered to benefit from housing projects.
“The department is strongly encouraging municipalities to go on special registration drives in its farm areas,” he said.
He said there could be potential problems with the design of the national Farm Resident's Housing Programme subsidy, which allowed the department to use public money to subsidise rental accommodation.
“The new minimum wage for farmworkers will put many farmworker households over the R3500 income level limit for the subsidy,” Madikizela said.
The department would be working closely with various bodies in the sector to find a solution.
“The aim is to develop a set of viable and useful on or near-farm accommodation options for typical Western Cape rural situations.”
The MEC identified another challenge preventing housing delivery to the poor, namely community conflict.
He said major housing projects often had to be repeatedly stopped.
“Local leaders and steering committees often use the projects to try to force the department to accommodate their agendas, which range from political agendas, to the promotion of self-interest through accessing work or business opportunities, to local forms of nepotism through trying to influence housing lists.
“Unfortunately, it is the people who most need houses who suffer as they have to wait longer for their housing opportunities.”
The department had set up units to deal with potential conflict before it arose and to assign extra security where needed.